↓ Skip to main content

“The demand to keep the camera activated was an unreasonable intrusion on the plaintiff’s privacy rights, the court ruled.”

NL Timesnltimes.nl ↗

Chetu already had his screen shared all day. It wanted his face on camera for nine hours too, and fired him two days after he said no. A Dutch court called the order a violation of Article 8 and awarded him roughly €75,000. Chetu deregistered its Dutch branch less than a week after the firing. Florida rules don’t travel.